It's been going on a very long time and is getting worse and worse all the time. A 1991 article regarding six families, all falsely accused of 'emotional harm', when it was actually Asperger's that was responsible for their children's presentations:
"Asperger's Syndrome - Who is Being Abused? Archives of Disease in Childhood 1991; 66: 693-695"
"Six case histories of children referred and admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit at a tertiary referral centre because of concerns about poor functioning and possible emotional abuse are presented.
On initial assessment the children appeared to be well functioning and the impression was confirmed that their emotional needs were not being met by their parents.
After detailed inpatient appraisal the diagnosis of Asperger's syndrome was made in all six cases..."
Parliament have known about the issue of autism families being wrongfully targeted since at least 2003: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200203/ldhansrd/vo030205/text/30205-10.htm (start at 5 Feb 2003 : Column 300 and see particularly Column 316).
This inquiry promised in 2004 did not happen - why?
"Asperger's abuse inquiry pledged"
Article about an autistic woman's childhood, during which, her parents were falsely accused of abuse due to misrepresentation of her autistic behaviours, read about the lasting the trauma that professionals caused to her and her family:
"The Damaging Legacy of Parent Blame"
NAS Safeguarding Conference January 2015 conference video - Tim Gilling and his wife were falsely accused of MSBP/FII:
"Getting it Wrong: The Impact on Families"
So WHY is this still going on?!
On page 9 of this 2016 FII/MSBP presentation document, Dr Danya Glaser lists autistic mothers as perpetrators of FII. This is shocking disability discrimination.
United Kingdom Human Rights Committee "Human Rights Violations Against Parents That Are Autistic, Have an Autism Spectrum Condition"
"Despite there being no cogent evidence to suggest ASC women are unable to competently mother their children, there are personal reports from both women and practitioners that mothers may risk being judged and misunderstood on the basis of their ‘non-typical’ responses or characteristics or even just preconceived misinformation about the nature of autism. Parents that cannot home school and are aiming for inclusive education within the education system can find their autistic differences and unmet disability needs in accessing the system to be wrongfully interpreted as character flaws. Barbara Martin of Cheshire based ‘Multi Sports’ is an advocate that has assisted autistic parents within schools. She states “autistic ladies are focused on getting to the bottom of their child’s difficulties and having the right supports put in place. They particularly cannot tolerate injustice but their intense focus can be perceived by non-autistic people as obsessive or controlling”. Mothers perceived this way can often be accused wrongfully as obsessing over their child’s disability to the detriment of the child identity and be labelled (without psychological reports) as Fabricating Illness in their child. Please see Case Study Three, School and Fabricating Illness.
One mother reported that she agreed to her children being removed, under the impression that the children were being taken for 72 hours as a form of respite. She was shocked to be given a few hour's notice the following day to attend court."
"Autism: A Hidden Pool of Undiagnosed Mothers With Condition Emerging"
Autistic women are, however, still likely to remain undiagnosed. A survey by the National Autistic Society found that 42% of females have been misdiagnosed, compared with 30% of males, while twice as many women were undiagnosed compared with men (10% compared with 5%). But experts are warning that these mothers risk having their children forcibly adopted in the fight to get them diagnosed and supported, as social workers misinterpret the parent’s autistic traits as indicating potential harm to the child. “Their own autism, often undiagnosed, means they put professionals’ backs up and can be accused of causing or fabricating their children’s condition,” said Gould."
"Positive and Negative Experiences of Mothers with Autism"
"Mothers with autism and mothers of children with autism were equally likely to have had contact with social services in the UK, with similar outcomes. Disturbingly, approximately 1 in 5 mothers of a child with autism, regardless of maternal diagnosis, were assessed by social services; of those, 1 in 6 had their child compulsorily placed for adoption. Finally, rates of allegations and investigations of suspected fabricated illness amongst children with autism and their siblings were two orders of magnitude higher than the known incidence the UK.
Conclusions: Mothers with autism would benefit from far more and better tailored support. Allegations of fabricated illness, and high rates of surveillance by social services suggest there may be discrimination towards mothers with autism. The stigma associated with autism may be a barrier to accessing services. Further research should consider the mental health implications of being a mother with autism. There is a clear need for more and better autism awareness within the UK."
Going on DESPITE:
"Parents on the autism continuum: Links with parenting efficacy"
"Group 1 consisted of 109 parents (29 fathers and 80 mothers) with ASD clinically diagnosed in both parent and child.These parents all had a clinically-confirmed ASD diagnosis and at least one child who also had been diagnosed with ASD Mothers in Group 1 did not have low parenting efficacy relative to other groups, despite being comparable in AQ scores to their male counterparts. Our experience is that mothers of children with ASD are often more accepting of the personal impact of ASD, are frequently highly active in pursuing resources and support for their child ("The Complete Guide to Asperger's Syndrome" Attwood, 2007), and more open to studying and developing their skills as parents (based on the couple/family literature,this is generally more characteristic of females than males even in nonclinic families). Mothers' attention to detail, logical thinking, and persistence, combined with a tendency to approach rather than avoid family problems, may increase the chances of parenting successes and therefore build a stronger sense of parenting efficacy."
"Adults and children with Asperger syndrome: Exploring adult attachment style, marital satisfaction and satisfaction with parenthood" https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2010.06.001
"Nor did the presence of a child with AS in the family elevate the prevalence of insecure adult romantic attachment in our study in contrast to Kissgen et al.’s (2009) findings for AAI reminiscences of parental attachment in households with children with a different disability (ADHD). Indeed, we found that even respondents in Group 2 (with both a spouse and a child with an AS diagnosis) were as overwhelmingly securely attached as control parents of similar age, gender and family size in without ASD anywhere in the family. ...the positive qualities (e.g., loyalty, intelligence) that high-functioning spouses with AS may often bring into marriage (Attwood, 2007) may conceivably compensate for difficulties in such a way that internal working models and spousal interaction patterns are not disrupted in ways that might diminish the neurotypical spouse’s adult attachment security over time.
Somewhat surprisingly, global satisfaction with marriage remained equally high irrespective of the presence versus absence of an AS diagnosis anywhere in the family and was likewise uninfluenced by spouses’ attachment security. Thoughts of divorce were higher if the respondent had an insecure attachment style, but this was as true in the non-clinic control group as in families with AS and, indeed, there was no difference among any of the four diagnostic groups on this variable, nor did total marital quality show significant main effects or interactions due either to attachment security or the presence versus absence of an AS family member when these two potential predictors were considered in conjunction with one another. In other words, marital satisfaction seemed relatively robust against influences of AS in self, spouse or child in this admittedly atypical sample of unpaid volunteer families living with AS who had remained married long enough to be rearing a child aged 3–18.
Equally surprisingly, for parenthood satisfaction, results showed that parental AS diagnosis (either in the self or the spouse) did not significantly diminish the satisfactions and pleasures that respondents derived from their parenting roles. Nor did the security of respondent’s adult attachment style."
"Sarah Hendrickx in her book ‘Women and Girls with Autism Spectrum Disorder’ reiterates this point in context of family life. “Women with autism who had a child with autism spoke of a special bond with that child and of having the intuition to know what their child needed even when it was different to what all the books and advice stated”. Sarah elaborates on the positive benefits of shared neurotype (child and parent being autistic) “the heritability of autism can be a blessing for some girls growing up with autism in families where similar characteristics may be inherent in parents”.
So why is this gross disability discrimination going on against autistic mothers?